1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7722 of 2025 1 - Smt. Maya Dewangan W/o Shri K.K. Dewangan Aged About 40 Years Lecturer At Government Higher Secondary School Sarkho Navagarh District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Directorate Of Publice Instruction (Dpi) Through Its Director Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer District Jangir Champa Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 6 - Principal Government Higher Secondary School Sivni Champa District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.26 18:31:21 +0530 2 26/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition against the impugned order dated 03.06.2025, whereby the petitioner, who is a Lecturer (LB) has been posted from Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sivni, Champa, District Janjgir-Champa to to Govt. Higher Secondary School, Sarkho, Block Navagarh, District Janjgir-Champa under the Rationalization Instructions dated 02.08.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall 3 decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in objective manner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved