Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34578 (BOM)

LILABAI DASHRATH PAWAR AND ANR v. PRAMOD SAHEBRAO MANE AND ANR

FA/2664/2019 · 2025-03-22

Lok Adalat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI, HELD ON 22nd March, 2025 AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 2664 OF 2019 Lilabai Dashrath Pawar And Anr VERSUS Pramod Sahebrao Mane And Anr • Mr. R. U. Gavhane h/f Mr. P. C. Mayure, Advocate for the Appellant • Mr. M. R. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Insurance Company • Ms. M. M. Gabhud Officer of Insurance Company is present ORDER (22nd March, 2025) 1. Parties have settled the disputes. Both the parties filed terms of compromise on record, which is marked as Exhibit ‘X’ for identification. The same are duly signed by the parties and their respective Advocates. Claimants are present before this panel and they confirm the contents of the settlement. They accept the same to be voluntary. 2. Having regard to the facts of the case, terms of settlement are reasonable and hence, deserves to be accepted. Learned Counsel for Insurer undertakes to deposit sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- before Tribunal within a 109-FA-2664-2019.odt 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:9430 period of six weeks. Learned Counsel for Appellant/Claimant seeks withdrawal of the said amount. Learned Counsel for Insurer records no objection for the same. Tribunal to permit withdrawal of the amount of Rs. 3,50,000/- by the Claimants. 3. In view of above, Appeal stands disposed of. 4. The Court Fee Refund Certificate be issued as per the Rules. 5. The Civil Application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. The award/decree be drawn up in terms of compromise. 7. No order as to costs. [A. B. Kadethankar] Advocate Member [V. B. Mantri] DJ (Retd.) Member [R. M. JOSHI, J.] Head of Panel usm 109-FA-2664-2019.odt 2 of 2