Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34574 (PNJ)

PURAN CHAND AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/2576/2025 · 2025-03-26

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-2576 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 Puran Chand and another State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents protection of life and liberty to and liberty at the behest of respondents 2. Sandeep Kumar, was married to respondent no.4 Gagandeep Rani and due to severe matrimonial disputes and various acts of misbehaviour and misconduct, they disinherited their son and daughter property(ies). He submits that their daughter relatives, i.e. respondents no.5 to 9, in order to grab their property(ies), are continuously threatening the petitioners with dire consequences and hence, they apprehend danger have already respondent no. 3. 2576-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Puran Chand and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners, who are senior citizens, petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents protection of life and liberty to them, who are apprehending danger of their life and liberty at the behest of respondents no.4 to Learned counsel for the petitioner Sandeep Kumar, was married to respondent no.4 Gagandeep Rani and due to severe matrimonial disputes and various acts of misbehaviour and misconduct, they disinherited their son and daughter erty(ies). He submits that their daughter relatives, i.e. respondents no.5 to 9, in order to grab their property(ies), are continuously threatening the petitioners with dire consequences and hence, apprehend danger from them. He furthers submits that already submitted representation dated respondent no.3 but no action is being taken upon Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2576-2025 Decided on:26.03.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents Rajesh Bhardwaj s, who are senior citizens, have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, for issuance of directions to respondents no.2 & 3 to provide , who are apprehending danger of their life to 9. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that their son, namely, Sandeep Kumar, was married to respondent no.4 Gagandeep Rani and due to severe matrimonial disputes and various acts of misbehaviour and misconduct, they disinherited their son and daughter-in-law from their family and erty(ies). He submits that their daughter-in-law, i.e. respondent 4 and her relatives, i.e. respondents no.5 to 9, in order to grab their property(ies), are continuously threatening the petitioners with dire consequences and hence, He furthers submits that the petitioner representation dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) to but no action is being taken upon it since long. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioners ...Respondents filed the present 528 of to provide , who are apprehending danger of their life their son, namely, Sandeep Kumar, was married to respondent no.4 Gagandeep Rani and due to severe matrimonial disputes and various acts of misbehaviour and misconduct, law from their family and law, i.e. respondent 4 and her relatives, i.e. respondents no.5 to 9, in order to grab their property(ies), are continuously threatening the petitioners with dire consequences and hence, the petitioners ) to VINOD KUMAR 2025.03.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2576 4. the State. 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.3 decide representation dated life and liberty to perceived. 6. the petitioner and his family members from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. March 26, 2025 vinod* 2576-2025 Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, decide representation dated 10.03.2025 (Annexure P life and liberty to the petitioners, if any threat to their life and liberty is It is clarified that this order shall not be the petitioner and his family members from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. March 26, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a perintendent of Police, Bathinda (Annexure P-5) and grant protection of , if any threat to their life and liberty is It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioner and his family members from legal action for violation of law, if (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES , accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Bathinda to protection of , if any threat to their life and liberty is taken to grant immunity to the petitioner and his family members from legal action for violation of law, if VINOD KUMAR 2025.03.27 09:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document