IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.622 of 2024 Date of Decision: 10.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Ram Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus Onkar Chand Sharma & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Ms. Dhanvanti, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 06.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, Arki Division, HP PWD Arki, enclosing therewith copy of communication dated 06.11.2025 issued under the signatures of Under Secretary (PW) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands complied with subject to outcome of LPA. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are 2 closed. However, respondents are directed to ensure that requisition proceedings in any eventuality are completed within four months from today, failing which, they would aggravate the contempt and petitioners would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against the erring officials. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. November 10, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge