Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34567 (RAJ)

JAGVEER S/O SOVRAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/3296/2024 · 2025-01-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1 of 2) [CRLAS-3296/2024] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 3296/2024 Jagveer S/o Sovran Singh, Resident Of Nagladani Police Station Sapau District Dholpur (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur (Raj) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p 2. Banne Singh S/o Nirotilal, Resident Of Nagladani Police Station Sapau Dsitrict Dholpur (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Yash Vardhan Nandwana For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.307/2024 dated 14.09.2024, registered at Police Station Sapau, District Dholpur for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Cases, Dholpur whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 483 B.N.S. on behalf of the appellant was rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has falsely been implicated in the case. Counsel for the accused- appellant further submits that the accused-appellant, complainant and injured Shailender have arrived at compromise and the compromise is annexed with this appeal as Annexure 3. It is further submitted that accused-appellant is in custody since (2 of 2) [CRLAS-3296/2024] 27.11.2024 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the appeal of accused-appellant may be allowed. 3. Learned counsel for complainant and the injured Shailender conceded that the accused-appellant, complainant and injured Shailender have arrived at compromise and they have no objection if the appeal of the accused-appellant is allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the fact that the injured himself has given an affidavit that he arrived at compromise with the accused- appellant, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal. 7. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity Cases), Dholpur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Jagveer S/o Sovran Singh, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.307/2024 dated 14.09.2024, registered at Police Station Sapau, District Dholpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -129