- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7476-DB W.P. No.29326/2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.29326/2024 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: MS. RAJAVARDHAN SANCHI VASANT AGED 19 YEARS D/O VASANT RAJAVARDHAN R/AT B-302, SATYAM ELEGENZA NEAR SARVODAYA NAGAR CHIKLORE, AMBARANATH (WEST) MAHARASHTRA 421505. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDAYA PRAKASH M, ADV.,) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA RERPESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION M S BUILDING DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001. 2. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560 041. 3. KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY 18TH CROSS ROAD, SAMPIGE RAOD MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU 560 012. Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7476-DB W.P. No.29326/2024 4. KARNATAKA AYURVEDA MEDICAL COLLEGE KECT TOWERS, HOIGEBAIL ASHOK NAGAR, MANGALURU 575006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.N. SUDEV HEGDE, AGA FOR R1 SRI. N.K. RAMESH, ADV., FOR R3 SRI. BASAVARAJ SAPPANNAVAR, ADV., FOR R2 R4 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE APPROPRIATE WRITS OR ORDERS QUASHING THE DIRECTION DATED 08.01.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No-2 TO RESPONDENT No-4 COLLEGE BY VERIFYING THE DOCUMENTS VIDE ANNEXURE-F DISCHARGING THE PETITIONER FROM THE BAMS COURSE ON THE GROUND OF LOWER PERCENTAGE IN PCB (10+2) & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Heard. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ashok Chand Singhvi vs. University of - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7476-DB W.P. No.29326/2024 Jodhpur and others1, in the light of several judgments to the contrary, we are not inclined to pass the orders as sought for. However, in case the petitioner wants to approach the respondent No.2-University with a further representation, the petitioner shall be permitted to do so. The request made by the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law. 3. The petitioner is, therefore, permitted to approach the University with the representation pointing out the factual aspects of the matter. 4. With the above observations, the writ petition shall stand disposed of. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 1 (1989) 1 SCC 399