2025:HHC:38781 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1570 of 2020 Decided on: 17.11.2025 _________________________________________________________ Sanjay Angaria & Others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. No. For the petitioners: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surya Chauhan and Ms. Yamini Sharma, Advocate, for LRs of respondents No.3 & 4. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Sanjay Angaria and three others have come up before this Court seeking following relief(s): (i). That the respondent-Consortium may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the applicants against their respective posts w.e.f. the date when their respective probation periods were successfully completed along with all consequential benefits including the arrears etc.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:38781 - 2 - 2. Upon listing of the instant matter today, Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan on instructions of Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate furnishes a communication dated 15.11.2025 [Taken on Record] revealing that the proposal for regularization of the petitioners has also been considered and approved by the competent authority. It is further averred that the petitioners and others have been approved for regularization subject to withdrawal of the pending petition from this Court. 3. Copy of the Instructions dated 15.11.2025 have been furnished to Learned Senior Counsel Mr. Subhash Sharma, assisted by Mr. Prantap Sharma, Advocate have no objection, in case, the contemplated regularization is given effect to by the Respondents herein. 4. Even the Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2-H.P. State Council for Science, Technology and Environment does not dispute the approval for regularization given by the competent authority as in Instruction dated 15.11.2025. 5. Taking into account the entirety of the facts 2025:HHC:38781 - 3 - and circumstances the Respondents No.1 to 4 are directed to give effect to the Instructions dated 15.11.2025 by regularizing the petitioners, in accordance with by law, within one month from today. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition along with pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge November 17, 2025 [Shivender]