Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34551 (KAR)

SUDHAMANI v. K.RANGHAVENDRA RAO

MFA/7779/2023 · 2025-03-08

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K. AND SRI. X.M. JOSEPH, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 7779/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 597/2025) BETWEEN: 1. Sudhamani Aged about 38 years, W/o Late Nanjundaiah. 2. Navya M.N., Aged about 18 years, D/o Late Nanjundaiah. 3. Manoj M.N. Aged about 9 years, S/o Late Nanjundaiah, Appellant No.3 is minor Represented by mother Appellant No.1 Sudhamani. 4. Siddaramaiah, Aged about 77 years, S/o Late Nanjundaiah. 2 5. Parvathamma Aged about 62 years, W/o Late Siddaramaiah. All are Residing at N. Mathighatta, Nittur Hobli, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur Dist-572 122. ...APPELLANTS (By Sri. Mushtaq Ahmed, Advocate) AND: 1. K. Ranghavendra Rao, Aged about 55 years, S/o K. Annayya, R/at No.13/2, Nijagal, Sompura Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore Rural Dist-562 111. 2. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Golden Heights, 4th Floor, No.1/2, 59th C Cross, 4th M Block, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-10, Rep. by its Manager. …RESPONDENTS (By Sri. B. Pradeep, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.c.o. dated 25.10.2024) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO. 402/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT-17, GUBBI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled amicably. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants - claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. Hence, the Joint Memo is accepted. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellants/claimants, on proper identification in terms of the apportionment made by the Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv