2025:CGHC:41526 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7983 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sarojini David W/o Shri P.Baby, Aged About 40 Years Teacher (Arts) T- Cadre, Government Girls Middle School Chikhlakasa, Block Dondi, Distt. Balod (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Collector Cum President, District Level Committee, Rationalization Committee, Balod Distt. Balod (Chhattisgarh) 3 - District Education Officer, Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 4 - Block Education Officer, Dondi, Distt. Balod (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Joint Director, Education Division, Durg, Distt. Durg (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri BL Dembra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Khulesh Sahu, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 18.08.2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Lecturer under the Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of on 23.06.2025 with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.08.19 18:48:22 +0530 Wps 7764 of 2025 2 the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted a Committee headed by the Director, Public Instructions, vide notification dated 8th July, 2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 8th July, 2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 8th July, 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 8th July, 2025 raising all the grievances, and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible, in an objective manner. 5. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma