[2025:RJ-JP:11571] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15681/2024 1. Rishikesh S/o Munesh Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Aitka, Police Station Bashedi, At Present Near Excise Police Station Dholpur. (At Present Confined At District Jail Dholpur) 2. Gaurav S/o Ghurelal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Aitka, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nisha Janknariya for Mr. A.S. Shekhawat For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Ms. Shashibala Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. This instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.351/2024 registered at Police Station Rajakheda, District Dholpur (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short ‘BNS’), 2023. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that parties have resolved their dispute amicably. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Charge- sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its [2025:RJ-JP:11571] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15681/2024] conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since 08.11.2024 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners however, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise and she has no objection if this bail application is allowed. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners so also considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1) Rishikesh S/o Munesh Singh and 2) Gaurav S/o Ghurelal, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:11571] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15681/2024] 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/799