Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34548 (KAR)

SRI RAVI v. SMT RATHNAMMA

RP/499/2024 · 2025-06-03

H P Sandesh

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18639 RP No. 499 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REVIEW PETITION NO.499 OF 2024 IN MFA NO.8678/2012(WC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAVI S/O. THIPPERUDRAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT BASAVESHWARA EXTENSION AJJAMPURA POST, THARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 547. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T.M.VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 2. SRI. H.MADHU S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 3. SRI. H.MANJUNATHA S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT VINOBANAGAR EXTENSION AJJAMPURA POST, THARIKERE TALUK CHICKMANGALUR DISTRICT-577 547. 4. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, K.M.ROAD CHICKMANGALUR-577 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18639 RP No. 499 of 2024 DIVISIONAL MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI B.C.SEETHARAMA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 AND ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908 PRAYING TO ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 09.07.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN M.F.A.NO.8678/2012 AND HEAR THE M.F.A.NO.8678/2012 ON MERITS BY RESTORING THE SAME ON ITS FILE AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. In the memo it is stated that parties have compromised the matter in Ex.No.104/2023 and hence, permitted to withdraw the petition. In view of the memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19