APHC010532832014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE • TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2085 OF 2014 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment in CRP No. 143 of 2012 dt.23.07’.2014 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court-Cum- Additional District Judge, Guntur. Between: Gujjula Rajeswari, W/o. Niranjana Reddy, Aged about 38 years R/o. D.No. 4- 179, Krosur Village & Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/Respondent/Petitioner AND 1. Gujjula Niranjana Reddy, S/o. Venkateswara Reddy, Aged about 41 Years, R/o. Gudibandavaripalem, Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The State of A P, rep. by Public Prosecutor. High Court at Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Appellant/Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2014 (CRLRCMP 3439 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment passed in C.R.P.143/12-on the file of the Judge, Family Court - cum- Additional District Judge, Guntur which was preferred / against the order in M.C.No.22/2009 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Juclicial Magistrate of I Class, Sattenapalli. Counsll for the Petitioner: SR| 3REEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for |he Respondent No.1: SRI G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: ^ APHC010532832014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2085/2014 Between: Gujjula Rajeswari ...PETITIONER AND Gujjula Niranjana Reddy Another Counsel for the Petitioner: SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.GVSMEHAR KUMAR The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) / ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. Report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Guntur, is received along with the statement of the petitioner/Gujjula Rajeswari, W/o. Gujjula Niranjana Reddy, in which she stated that the whereabouts of 2 respondent No. 1-her husband are not known. The marriage in between the petitioner and respondent No.1 was dissolved at the behest of respondent No.1 by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, in H.M.O.P.No.140 of 2015. The petitioner has been working as ANM in regular service and getting a monthly salary of Rs.29,000/-; she is ready to close the present Criminal Revision Case as her husband obtained divorce. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case as she is sufficiently earning as ANM in regular service. 3. 4. Recording the above submissions, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER 1. The Judge, Family Court-Cum- Additional District Judge, Guntur.(with records) 2. One CC to Sri. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. G V S Mehar Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Pradesh. 6. Two CD Copies To, Andhra Chp vna HIGH COURT DATED:18/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC No.2085 OF 2014 X 15JUt 2025 ? *3.^ . Current Section ■*- ■' DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS WITHDRAWN