Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34546 (KAR)

D.V. NAGESH v. RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CRL.RP/1579/2023 · 2025-01-23

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2970 CRL.RP No. 1579 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1579 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. D.V.NAGESH S/O D VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.42/1, RUDRAPPA TEMPLE ROAD NEAR KEMPEGOWDA SWIMMING POOL GAVIPURAM WEST BENGALURU-560019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. C.N.SRINIVAS RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMAKRISHNA REDDY S/O D. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT B.K.HALLI VILLAGE NAGALAMADIKE HOBLI PAVAGADA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572101. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.5020/2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE TUMAKURU SITTING AT MADHUGIRI DATED 26.10.2023 AND THE ORDER PASSED IN COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PAVAGADA DATED 24.11.2022 IN C.C.NO.684/2021 (OLD Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2970 CRL.RP No. 1579 of 2023 C.C.NO.565/2016) AND THEREBY REVISION PETITIONER/ACCUSED MAY BE ACQUITTED FROM THE OFFENCE P/U/S.138 OF NI ACT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for revision petitioner is absent. In the previous date also the counsel was absent. This Court vide order dated 15.01.2025 made an observation that sentence of the petitioner was suspended vide order dated 15.11.2024 and no compliance and P.F also not paid inspite of notice is issued against the respondent. The earlier order of suspension of sentence is recalled and directed to pay the P.F within one week and also made it clear that if P.F is not paid within one week, list the matter for dismissal. Inspite of the said order also, counsel is not pursuing the matter and hence, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE RHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43