APHC010535252014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 36948/2014 Between: 1. P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO,, S/O P.KISHAN RAO, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O 1- 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD & II)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION, (AS ESTABLISHED FULL TIME IN 1993), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, 'ERUVAKA' BUILDING, KHAIREITABAD, HYDERABAD Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the aton of Respondent No.1 in issuing the G.O.MS.No.19 dated 20.11.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and direct the Respondents to continue with the functioning of the original A.P. Consu time in 1993 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 36948/2014 P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO,, S/O P.KISHAN RAO, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC: -9-295/27/6/A, VIDYANAGAR, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES (CS II)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION, (AS ESTABLISHED FULL TIME IN 1993), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, 'ERUVAKA' BUILDING, KHAIREITABAD, HYDERABAD- 500 004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of andamus declaring the aton of Respondent No.1 in issuing the G.O.MS.No.19 dated 20.11.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and direct the Respondents to continue with the functioning of the original A.P. Consumer Commission as established full IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO,, S/O P.KISHAN RAO, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC: 295/27/6/A, VIDYANAGAR, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS CIVIL SUPPLIES (CS- II)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION, (AS ESTABLISHED FULL TIME IN 1993), REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, 'ERUVAKA' BUILDING, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of andamus declaring the aton of Respondent No.1 in issuing the G.O.MS.No.19 dated 20.11.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same and direct the Respondents to continue with mer Commission as established full 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 46219 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned G.O.Ms.No.19 dated 20.11.2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AVINASH DESAI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES 3 The Court made the following Order: Ms. K.Tanusha, learned counsel representing Sri Avinash Desai, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 08.09.2025 MDP