Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3454 (JHR)

MAHABIR PRASAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./766/2025 · 2025-02-04

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.766 of 2025 ------ Mahabir Prasad aged about 34 Years S/O Lala Saw R/O Village- Raidih, P.O. & P.S- Raidih, District- Gumla (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 04-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.334 of 2024 instituted under Sections 55/61 (2) of B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 (1) of Arms Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused persons has conspired to kill the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and because of enmity between the petitioner and the informant, this false case has been foisted. It is also submitted that the co-accused persons, with similar allegations, have already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 07.01.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.8025 of 2024. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Gumla in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.334 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change her mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/