Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3454 (AP)

ABOTHULA RAJARATNAM NAIDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1025/2025 · 2025-01-23

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010017092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1025/2025 Between: Abothula Rajaratnam Naidu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KURITI BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “….declaring the high action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in interfering into the petitioners’ property on 21.12.2024, 28.12.2024 and on 07.01.2025 consisting of Ac.5.50 cents in Survey No.189 situated at Phool Bagh Colony area, Bobbili Town, Vizianagaram 2 District, which was purchased by way of Regd. Sale deed No.8470 of 1988, which is arbitrary, bad and illegal, irrational and hit by the Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India, violation of principles of natural justice, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction, consequently direct the respondents not to interfere Into the petitioners’ property as stated supra in the interest of justice….” 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, appearing for the 4th respondent. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order dated 25.11.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12837 of 2017. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleaders opposed for grant of any relief in this writ petition and prays to dismiss the same. 5. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and upon perusing the material on record, this Writ Petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.12837 of 2017, dated 25.11.2024. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order in W.P.No.12837 of 2017, dated 25.11.2024, to this order. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date: 23.01.2025 ARR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.1025 of 2025 Date : 23.01.2025 ARR