Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34537 (MAD)

A.D.TIKKARAM v. STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

CRL OP/7207/2025 · 2025-03-13

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 Tikkaram. A.D. ... Petitioner Vs 1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Superintendent of Police, Chengalpet District – 603 002. 2. Inspector of Police, G-10, Anaicut Police Station, Cheyyur, Pavunjur, Chengalpet District – 603 312. 3. Gopinath ... Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., to direct the second respondent to provide adequate Police protection to the petitioner and to consider the representation dated 17.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Varun For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 & R2 p. 2 Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 O RDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to provide adequate Police protection to the petitioner while surveying his property. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the first and second respondent and perused the materials available on record. 3. The petitioner owned the property comprised in Old S.No.72/1, New S.No.72/1B, situated at Thondamanallur Village, Cheyyur Taluk, Kanchipuram District. The petitioner intended to survey the property and to fence the same. However, the third respondent obstructed the Surveyor from surveying the petitioner's property. As such, the third respondent is neither the adjacent owner nor a relation to the petitioner claiming the subject property. The petitioner also paid the requisite fees before the Revenue Authorities to survey the property. p. 3 Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 4. In view of the above, the Surveyor, while surveying the petitioner's property, if he finds any obstruction at the hands of the third respondent or any adjacent land owners, can seek Police protection before the second respondent. On such a request, the second respondent is directed to provide adequate Police protection, after conducting an enquiry, and pass orders to provide adequate Police protection to the Surveyor to survey the petitioner's property. 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 13.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order kv p. 4 Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Chengalpet District – 603 002. 2. Inspector of Police, G-10, Anaicut Police Station, Cheyyur, Pavunjur, Chengalpet District – 603 312. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. p. 5 Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, kv Crl.O.P.No.7207 of 2025 13.03.2025