DR. YASH VIJAY SON OF DR. KAILASH VIJAY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19565/2024 · 2025-02-19
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34536 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34536 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7363] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19565/2024 Dr. Yash Vijay Son Of Dr. Kailash Vijay, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of A-97, Model Town, Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Medical And Health, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jaipur Ii, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.B.L. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 19/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the matter is no more res integra as the same is already decided by
order dated 03.09.2020 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9113/2020 titled as Dr. (Mrs.) Pooja Mathur & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. It is further averred that vide the said order, the Court has granted specific directions to the competent authority to consider the claim of the petitioner(s) therein, in light of the judgment relied upon. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the representation, if filed, will be considered on merits in accordance with the law.
[2025:RJ-JP:7363] (2 of 2) [CW-19565/2024] Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the present petition, this Court direct that if any representation is filed by the petitioners, within a period of seven day from the date of passing of the present judgment, the same be considered by competent authority, in accordance with the law, within a period of 30 days, as instructions given in Chief Secretary Circular dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-282