Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34535 (ALL)

RAVINDRA NISHAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/678/2025 · 2025-04-04

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:48508 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 678 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravindra Nishad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pragya Singh,Rajan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 1339 of 2019 (old case no. 6314 of 2011), arising out of case crime no. 519 of 2011, under Sections 326, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station Sikrara, District Jaunpur, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said case and same is pending since the year 2011. It is also submitted that Charges have been framed in the matter. It is also submitted that evidence of four prosecution witnesses has been recorded and the case is at the stage of recording the evidence of other witnesses. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the said case is pending since the year 2011 and the same is at the stage of recording of the evidence of witnesses. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the said case preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of the certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad