Page No.1 of 3 2025:CGHC:9722 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 62 of 2020 1 - Dhani Ram.. (died and deleted as per CO dt. 25.02.2025] 1(a) Prasadhi Bai W/o Late Dhani Ram Rajwar, aged about 62 years, Occupation- Housewife, R/o Village Sarbhoka, Post Sarboka, Police Station Patna, Tehsil- Baikunthpur, District Koriya (CG) 1(b) Chandrabhan Rajwar, S/ Late Dhani Ram Rajwar, aged about 45 years, Occupation- Cultivation, R/o Village Sarbhoka, Post Sarboka, Police Station Patna, Tehsil- Baikunthpur, District Koriya (CG) 1(c) Kamalbhan Rajwar, S/o Late Dhani Ram Rajwar, aged about 40 years, Occupation- Cultivation, R/o Village Sarbhoka, Post Sarboka, Police Station Patna, Tehsil- Baikunthpur, District Koriya (CG) 2 - Dharamsai, S/o Late Dhirsai, Aged About 50 Years Caste Rajwade, R/o Shrinagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh...................Defendant, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Basanti, Wd/o Late Kamalsai, Aged About 53 Years Caste Rajwade, R/o Shrinagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh...................Defendant, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Binaka, S/o Late Kamalsai, Aged About 23 Years Caste Rajwade, R/o Shrinagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh...................Defendant, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Bholaram S/o Late Kamalsai, Aged About 22 Years Caste Rajwade, R/o Shrinagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh...................Defendant, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Babli, D/o Late Kamalsai, Aged About 20 Years Caste Rajwade, R/o Shrinagar, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh...................Defendant, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ram Pyare (Died) Through Lrs Smt. Phoolmati W/o Late Ram Pyare, Aged About 60 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Bharau, Thana- Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2025.02.25 18:00:11 +0530 Page No.2 of 3 Chhattisgarh......................Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 2 - Dhurpat Kumar, S/o Late Ram Pyare Aged About 35 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Bharau, Thana- Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya Chhattisgarh......................Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Sampat Kumar, S/o Late Ram Pyare, Aged About 30 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Bharau, Thana- Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya Chhattisgarh......................Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Rajesh, S/o Late Ram Pyare, Aged About 25 Years Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Bharau, Thana- Manendragarh, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koriya Chhattisgarh......................Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Shambhu Prasad Patel, S/o Late Jagarnath, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Sarbhoka, Post Sarbhoka, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Netlal Patel, S/o Late Jagarnath Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Sarbhoka, Post Sarbhoka, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.............Plaintiff, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Daiya Patel, S/o Late Jagarnath, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Charcha Colliery, Post Charcha, Subhas Nagar, Hanuman Mandir, P.S. Jainagar, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, District Koriya Chhattisgarh, District : Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25 . 02 .202 5 1. Heard on IA 01, which is an application filed under Order 22 Rule 3 of CPC for substitution of LRs of the applicant No.01 on record. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Page No.3 of 3 Let the LRs of the applicant No.01, as proposed in the application, be brought on record during the course of the day. 3. Also heard finally. 4. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of SA No.415 of 2005 which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 06.01.2020. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Order dated 06.01.2020 is hereby recalled. SA No.415 of 2005 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if