[2025:RJ-JP:860] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 15626/2024 Kurshaid @ Turfaid S/o Raheesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg, District Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 15634/2024 1. Rukku S/o Rajjak, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Gadhi Jheel Patti, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Ajrudin S/o Saddik, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Gadhi Jheel Patti, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 15663/2024 Irfan S/o Nawab, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg District Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 16016/2024 Mohammad Anish Khan S/o Mahar Sahab, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Veg Pahadi, P.s. Kaithwara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP [2025:RJ-JP:860] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-15626/2024] ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 16017/2024 1. Sajid S/o Asha, R/o Buapur Gadhi, Police Station Kathwada, District Deeg. (Petitioner Is Lodged In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Abid S/o Asha, R/o Buapur Gadhi, Police Station Kathwada, District Deeg. (Petitioner Is Lodged In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Shakir Khan Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Ravindra Kumar Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2025 1. These second bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 154/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for offence under Section 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and u/S 66D of IT Act. 2. The first bail applications, filed by the accused petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 24.10.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of charge-sheet. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submit that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He further [2025:RJ-JP:860] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-15626/2024] submits that no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioners. He also submits that the accused petitioners are in custody for more than three months and they are no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery and the trial will take its own time, therefore the accused petitioners may be released on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners and so also the fact that no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioners and they are in custody for more than three months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these second bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that such type of accused persons of particular areas, who are found to be involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is stipulated that [2025:RJ-JP:860] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-15626/2024] the accused-petitioners shall not celebrate their release in public, and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail. 8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file(s). (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /33-37