APHC010535572011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11632/2011 Between: GVD KESAVA RAO, S/O.GVR RAM MOHAN RAO, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O.SENAGAPAPPU BAZAR 5 SHOPS, ELURU-534001, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, BANK STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA LOCAL HEAD OFFICE REP BY ITS, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (P&H) BANK STREET,KOTI,HYDERABAD 3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, RTC COMPLEX,VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or orders direction or directions declaring the action of the respondents in not absorbing the petitioner as Watchman or in any other equal post in pursuance to the selections that have taken place for the purpose of absorption of the Ex.Contract Labour of Staff Training Centre, Kakinada, as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and to issue a consequential direction to the Respondents to absorb the petitioner as a Watchman or in any other equivalent post on par with the 1st respondent in WP.No.12954 of 2001 dated 23.6.2010. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 14234 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the 2 petitioner for absorption as a Watchman on par with the petitioner in WP.No.12954 of 2001 pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. 3845/B G RAVINDER REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11632 of 2011 ORDER: Ms.Priyanvitha Popuri, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, it has rendered infructuous by afflux of time and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition. Learned counsel also endorsed the same on the bundle. In view of the said representation, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 27.06.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11632 of 2011 Date : 27.06.2025 SPP