Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3452 (JHR)

REYAZ ANSARI ALIAS SAHADAT ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3834/2025 · 2025-06-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:14808] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3834 of 2025 Reyaz Ansari @ Sahadat Ansari, aged about 41 years, son of Noor Hasan, resident of village- Rochap, P.O. & P.S.- Patratu, Dist.- Ramgarh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen , Adv. For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.PP. 05 / 09.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Patratu P.S. case no. 148 of 2024 instituted under Sections 385, 387, 379, 427, 34 of the IPC and Section 27 fo the Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was demanding extortion. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused Chand Khan. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 19.08.2024, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application and though the petitioner is not named in the FIR but without putting him on the TIP, charge sheet has been submitted and the charge has also been framed on 07.05.2025. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for regular bail and submits that the petitioner is the involved in 37 criminal cases. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above and the period of custody undergone, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Ramgarh in connection with Patratu P.S. case no. 148 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-