K.VISHALA, VIJAYAWADA-10 v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION & 4 OTHERS
WA/1613/2008 · 2025-08-04
A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34519 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34519 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ APHC010535702008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI B S',* Oifi z TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1613 OF 2008 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 06.11.2008 in WP No. 18507 of 2008 on the file of the High Court. Between: K.Vishala, W/o. Shyam Sunder, aged about 54 years. Lecturer, SDMSM Kalasala, Vijayawada - 10 ...Petitioner AND
1. Commissioner of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad.
2. Regional Joint Director of Intermediate Education, Arts College Campus, Rajahmundry
3. The Promostion Committee, SDMSM Kalasala, Vijayawada - 10 Rep by its Convenor
4. The Secretary and Correspondent, SDMSM Kalasala, Vijayawada -10
5. Smt. T. Asha Rani, Lecturer, SDMSM Kalasala, Vijayawada - 10 Rep by its Convenor. ...Respondents
«r lA NO: 1 OF 2008(WAMP 3142 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings dated 11.08.2008 pending disposal of the above Appeal. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R SUDHEER Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 & 4: — Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI RAMA RAO GHANTA The Court made the following Judgment:
1 ~ , ay THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL No.1613 of 2008
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Deyanand) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. The learned Government Pleader appearing for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 has brought to the notice of this Court that the appellant promoted as Principal in the respondent-Coilege and retired way back in the year 2012 itself. He has placed a copy of the Letter, dated 24.07.2024 of the appellant addressed to the Registrar of this Court for perusal. was
3. The said Letter, dated 24.07.2024 is placed on record.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned Government Pleader and on perusal of the averments made in the Letter, dated 24.07.2024, this Court is satisfied that the relief sought in this Writ Appeal is not survived as date and as such no further adjudication is required in the present appeal. on
5. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
2 S As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE copy// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri R Sudheer, Advocate (OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Higher Education [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri Rama Rao Ghanta,
4. Two CD Copies High Court of Andhra Pradesh Advocate [OPUC] TF
HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025
JUDGMENT WA NO. 1613 OF 2008 AND/y^ oV o 1 1 AUG 2025 rn 93 DISMISSING THE W.A.
WITHOUT COSTS AS INFRUCTUOUS,