Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34508 (KAR)

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/30853/2024 · 2025-01-27

M G S Kamal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3519 WP No. 30853 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 30853 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, W/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, AT NO.1125/12, 1ST FLOOR, SERVICE ROAD, HAMPINAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 104. REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI. K.N.SURENDRA S/O NAGAU. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. ARPITHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MAHESH M.,ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFFICE AT NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJABHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3519 WP No. 30853 of 2024 BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2, THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB) NO 39, 4TH FLOOR, "SHANTI GRUHA", BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. GOPAL V. BILALMANE., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED LAND ACQUISITION NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE R-1 BEARING NO.CI 58 SPQ 2024 DATED 15.03.2024 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF KIAD ACT 1966 AT ANNEXURE-A IN RESPECT OF SY.NO. 33 MEASURING 0-30 GUNTAS OF S.MEDAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA-1 HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner files a memo which reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for petitioners herewith submits that, the present petition was filed challenging the preliminary notification, and in view of the final notification dated issued by the Respondents, the present writ petition has become infructuous and the petitioners are withdrawing the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3519 WP No. 30853 of 2024 present petition with a liberty to challenge the said final notification. In the circumstances, the Petitioners pray this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Petition to challenge the final notification in accordance with law. This Memo may be taken on record and render justice." 2. Memo is taken on record. Petition is disposed of with liberty as sought for. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SBN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18