Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4123 RFA No. 123 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. ANNAYYA @ MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 2. GOPAL S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 3. YELLAPPA S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 4. VENKATESH S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 5. AKKAIAH @ YALLAMMA D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4123 RFA No. 123 of 2024
R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 6. MAADHAMMA @ RADHA D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 7. YASHODHA D/O LATE ANNAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT VABASANDRA VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. 8. 8(a) GOVINDA S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA DEAD BY LRS.,
NAGALAKSHMI W/O LATE GOVINDA @ GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
8(b)
SUGUNA D/O LATE GOVINDA @ GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
8(c) RAVI D/O LATE GOVINDA @ GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
8(d) LAVANYA D/O LATE GOVINDA @ GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
NO.8(a) TO (d) ARE R/AT A.K. COLONY, ANEKAL TOWN,
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4123 RFA No. 123 of 2024
BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 130. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SEENA @ SRINIVASA S/O LATE YALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.432, SANTHE BEEDHI, JANATHA COLONY, BANNERGHATTA JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560 083. 2. AMARESH.Y S/O LATE YALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.68, NEAR GOVT. HOSPITAL, GUDDAHATTI VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 083. 3. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE KAKAPPA @ MUNIYELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT GUDDAHATTI VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 083. …RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the appellants has appeared in person and sought time to comply with the office objections. - 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:4123 RFA No. 123 of 2024
This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed on 13.01.2025, on that day, finally two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections’ on 27.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellants have not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 13.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17