INDU DAUGHTER OF SHRI SANWAR MAL, WIFE OF HITESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/2190/2024 · 2025-01-03
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34503 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:446] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2190/2024
1. Indu Daughter Of Shri Sanwar Mal, Wife Of Hitesh Kumar, Aged About 18 Years, Resident Of Ward No.1, Surajwali Dhani, Saiedpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
2. Hitesh Kumar Son Of Shri Veer Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Jhalara, Tehsil And District Neem-Ka- Thana, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Preclinical Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Superintendent Of Police, Neem-Ka-Thana, District Neem- Ka-Thana, Rajasthan.
3. S.h.o. Police Station Jajod, District Sikar.
4. S.h.o. Police Station Dabla, District Neem-Ka-Thana.
5. Sanwarmal Son Of Bhinwaram, Resident Of Ward No.1, Surajwali Dhani, Saiedpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
6. Santosh Devi Wife Of Sanwarmal, Resident Of Ward No.1, Surajwali Dhani, Saiedpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
7. Biharilal Son Of Bhinwaram, Resident Of Ward No.1, Surajwali Dhani, Saiedpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
8. Sanjana Devi Wife Of Biharilal, Resident Of Ward No.1, Surajwali Dhani, Saiedpura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
9. Mahendra Son Of Rameshwarlal, Resident Of Jaita Ki Dhani, Jajod, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Indu with Mr. Hitesh Kumar (petitioners in person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, PP
[2025:RJ-JP:446] (2 of 3) [CRLW-2190/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 03/01/2025
1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry are waived.
2. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 9 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage on their own free will. Copy of marriage certificate dated 02.12.2024 has been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but family members and relatives who are respondent Nos.5 to 9 are not happy with their marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent no.2-Superintendent of Police, District Neem Ka Thana and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of.
[2025:RJ-JP:446] (3 of 3) [CRLW-2190/2024]
7. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /509