1 / 2 2025:CGHC:32532 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3630 of 2025 Raheesh Ahamad S/o Munir Ahamad Aged About 47 Years R/o- Prop Writer of M/s- Nafees Transport Service, Address C/o- Irshad Alam, Kharsiya Naka, Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.) Permanent Address- Pali Road, Ward No. 5/6, Om Colony Shahdol, Distt.- Shahdol (M.P.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Transport, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Regional Transport Authority Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishab Bisen, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 14/07/2025 1. Following relief has been claimed in this writ petition:- 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the application of petitioner for grant of Permanent Stage Carriage Permit, in accordance with provisions of Motor Vehicle Act. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in favour of petitioner, may also be granted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.07.15 10:44:08 +0530 2 / 2 an application for grant of permanent Stage Carriage Permit on the route Ambikapur to Rewa via Vishrampur, Surajpur, Patna, Baikunthpur, Manendragarh, Rajnagar, Kotma, Anuppur, Budhar, Shahdol, Jaishnagar, Kelhari, Devlod, Govindgarh and one trip back vehicle bearing Registration No. CG 15 DX 3921 before the respondent authorities and requisite fee has also been paid accordingly. He submits that the application of the petitioner has not been decided in accordance with law despite of the fact that it should have been decided within a period of 60 days in lie of Rule 74(4) of C.G. Motor Vehicles Rule, 1994. Therefore, he submits that the respondents may be directed to decide the application within a reasonable period of time. 3. Learned counsel for the State has not opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 4. It is expected that respondent no. 2 shall take decision on the application made by the petitioner within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu