Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34498 (HP)

ARUN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/19602/2025 · 2025-12-12

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19602 of 2025 Decided on: 12.12.2025. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arun Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Sikander Bhushan and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocates General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievances is that his representation (Annexure P-4), seeking applicability of Yashwant Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2CWP No. 8148 of 2022, decided a/w connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Yashwant Kumar2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 12, 2025 Judge yogesh