Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3449 (RAJ)

GOVIND SINGH @ KHATYA S/O RAMCHANDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/657/2025 · 2025-03-11

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11130] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 657/2025 Govind Singh @ Khatya S/o Ramchandra, R/o Mala Ground Baran, Police Station Kotwali, District Baran (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.502/2024 registered at Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural for the offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 352 & 351(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that it is a case of simple injury. It is submitted that dispute has been resolved amicably by the parties. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 26.12.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:11130] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-657/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant/victim does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that it is a case of simple injury; dispute has been resolved amicably by the parties; petitioner is in custody since 26.12.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Govind Singh @ Khatya S/o Ramchandra, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /385