119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-16449-2025 Date of decision: 16.05.2025 ANIL JOGI ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Ambika Sood, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** AMARJOT BHATTI , J (Oral): 1. Nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner was notified about the date fixed in this case. But nobody has turned up on his behalf. 2. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Sudesh, informed that in the case in hand complainant-Uma Jogi Sood i.e. respondent No.2 has expired on 27.04.2025. Even, today nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner to pursue the present petition. It appears that counsel for petitioner is not entrusted to pursue the present petition and the same stands dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. 3. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed of accordingly. (AMARJOT BHATTI) JUDGE 16.05.2025 monika 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.05.16 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document