APHC010533932022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4176/2022 Between: 1. V.KAMALA MISRA, W/O. PRATAP CHANDRA PANDA, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. EXTENSION OFFICER, DWCRA, DRDA, WORKING AS APM (FPO), RAMBHADRAPURAM MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GOPALA KRISHNA DIVEDI, I.A.S., PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECREATY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI A MD IMTLAZ I A S, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATION OF RURAL POVERTY, N.T.R. ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA-520001, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SMT A SURYA KUMARI IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM. 4. SRI A KALYANA CHAKRAVARTHI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MARTI CHANRIA REDDY BHAVAN, BEHIND 2 COLLECTORATE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT., VIZIANAGARAM. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to notice the respondents and punish them for their wilfull, deliberate and wanton violation of the Order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.P.No.17059 of 2022, dated 28.06.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAVITEJA PADIRI 2. VADAPALLI RAMESH The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Contempt Case No.4176 of 2022 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main writ petition i.e. W.P.No.17059 of 2022, wherein an interim order, dated 28.06.2022, was passed, non-compliance of which is assailed in the present contempt case, has now been withdrawn and in view of the said development, the Contempt Case cannot be proceeded with. 2. In view of the same, the Contempt Case stands closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:07.07.2025. cs