$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16353/2025&CM APPL. 80588/2025 AKASH VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person versus HDFC BANK LTD AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Adv. Shivangi Goel for R1 Ms. Tanya Chowdhary, Ms. Nisha Sharma Advocates for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 18.02.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing Respondent No. 1 — HDFC Bank Ltd. to immediately unfreeze the Petitioner’s Savings Bank Account No. 50100804125637 maintained at its Ashok Vihar Branch, New Delhi, and restore full operability thereof. 2. Declare that the freezing of the Petitioner’s said account is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India. 3. Direct Respondent No. 2 to ensure that banks not resort to arbitrary freezing of accounts without due process. 4. Award compensation to the Petitioner for mental agony, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 professional loss, and violation of Fundamental Rights.” 2. The case of the petitioner, a practising advocate, has a savings account bearing No. 50100804125637 with respondent No. 1 Bank, which he used for professional and personal household transactions. 3. On 01.10.2025, an amount of Rs. 1 lakhs was deposited in petitioner’s account by his client namely M/s Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers towards part payment of professional fees in respect of a matter and on the same day, his bank account was frozen by respondent No. 1 Bank under the pretext of “unusual activity.” 4. Thereafter, the petitioner received emails dated 02.10.2025 and 16.10.2025 from respondent No. 1 Bank and the same are extracted below:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 5. Pursuant to the said emails, the petitioner gave a detailed representation dated 16.10.2025, which reads as under:- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 6. However, the respondent No. 1 Bank did not take action thereafter and the freeze of the petitioner’s account with funds amounting to Rs. 44,896.97/-, continues. 7. Hence, the present petition. 8. A perusal of the emails of the respondent No. 1 Bank (reproduced above) shows that the petitioner’s account has been frozen on the basis of some activity in the said account which does not match the usual transaction pattern. However, no details have been given regarding the transactions and no reasons have been attributed as to how the same does not match the transaction patterns of the petitioner. 9. Further, a perusal of the petitioner’s reply dated 16.10.2025, to my mind, satisfactorily explains the amounts deposited in petitioner’s account. 10. Additionally, freezing of an account of a person has serious consequences as the petitioner is unable to access his account containing his own money and the same results in undue hardship and inconvenience to the account holder. The respondent bank cannot take such harsh measures without complying with the principles of natural justice and without any application of mind. 11. No doubt the respondent bank, under Reserve Bank of India Master Directions, is required to look for suspicious transactions but that does not give the right to the respondent bank to act arbitrarily and whimsically. 12. The Principles of Natural Justice require a Show Cause Notice/ a hearing before taking such drastic measures as freezing of an account. 13. The emails dated 02.10.2025 and 16.10.2025 from respondent No. 1 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41 Bank, as reproduced above, are cryptic and devoid of any reasons and cannot form the basis for freezing the account of the petitioner. 14. Hence, the petition is allowed and the account bearing No. 50100804125637 with respondent No. 1 Bank, shall be unfreezed forthwith and immediately. 15. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, along with pending applications, if any. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 18, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/02/2026 at 15:48:41