SUNIL RAJU SONET @ RAJPUT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
ABA/2209/2024 · 2025-02-04
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34473 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2209 OF 2024 SUNIL RAJU SONET @ RAJPUT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER … Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S. P. Nimbalkar APP for Respondent-State : Mr. S. K. Shirse ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : February 06, 2025.
PER COURT :-
1. The matter has been moved for speaking to the minutes.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.
3.
Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently, in the
order dated 04/02/2025, in paragraph No.6 of page No.3, Line No.2 and Line No.6, it is mentioned as ‘Section 306 of IPC (107 of B.N.S.)’, which is to be corrected as ‘Section 305 IPC (107 of B.N.S.)’.
4. The request for replacing ‘Section 305 IPC (107 of B.N.S.)’ instead of ‘Section 306 of IPC (107 of B.N.S.)’ appears to be appropriate in the circumstances.
5. As such, necessary corrections be carried out in the order dated 04/02/2025, in ABA No.2209/2024. Copies issued, if any, shall be deemed to be corrected accordingly.
6. Motion for speaking to the minutes stands disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
1 of
1 2025:BHC-AUG:3127This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //