Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34460 (KAR)

MOHAMMED SALAM ULLA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/30191/2024 · 2025-01-28

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3691 WP No. 30191 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 30191 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MOHAMMED SALAM ULLA S/O MOHAMMED AMAN ULLA, AGED 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 4574, NEAR JAMIYA MASJID, MASJID MOHALLA, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUMATHI PAULIN M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION VISHVESHWARIAH TOWER DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - 560 001 (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR) 2. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA TOWN MUNICIPALITY, OLD BANGALORE MYSORE ROAD, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1; SRI. A NAGARAJAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA DIRECTING R2 TO ISSUE E KHATHA TO THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF HIS PROPERTY BEARING PID NUMBER 192/B/104/B42 192/B/104/B42/1 AND Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3691 WP No. 30191 of 2024 192/B/104/B42/2 SITUATED AT CHAMUNDIPURA, 1 BLOCK RAMANAGARA THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this petition is for issuance of a mandamus to direct respondent No.2 to issue E-khata to the petitioner in respect of the property bearing PID No.192/B/104/B42, 192/B/104/B42/1 and 192/B/104/B42/2 in respect of which a manual khata has been issued. 2. Learned counsel for the Municipal Council points out that as per Annexure – G, the petitioner was called upon to furnish certain documents and since the same has not been furnished the request of the petitioner for issuance of an E-khata has remained unconsidered. 3. In the light of the above, the petitioner is permitted to furnish the documents sought for at Annexure – G to facilitate the Municipal Council to issue an E – Khata in respect of the petitioner’s property. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3691 WP No. 30191 of 2024 4. It is needless to state that if the petitioner has been issued the manual khata, there can be no impediment for the Municipality to issue an E-khata since it has already recognized the petitioner as the person primarily liable to pay tax and has entered his name in the records. 5. This petition is accordingly disposed of directing the petitioner to furnish the documents thereafter the Panchayat shall consider the same and pass an order within a period of three weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of the documents. 6. It is also open for the petitioner to file his objections to Annexure – G and narrate as to why these documents sought for were unnecessary for the consideration of E- khata since manual khata has already been issued in his name. 7. This petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7