1 2025:CGHC:38217 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 780 of 2025 1 - Jagdish Ram Sinha S/o Late Shri Chaitram Sinha Aged About 66 Years Retired As Paricharak At Central Semen Station Anjora, District Durg Chhattisgarh R/o Sharda Chowk Ward No. 10, Shankarpur, Rajnandgaon, Police Station Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Veterinary And Animal Husbandry Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., 2 - Director, Veterinary Service, Floor No. 3 Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., 3 - Deputy Director Veterinary Service, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. 4 - Mahaveer Patel Presently Posted As Assistant Filed Officer At Veterinary Hospital Musara Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 5 - Shyamlal Chaturvedani Presently Posted As Assistant Filed Officer At Veterinary Hospital Bagur Block Chhuikhadan District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.08.04 17:51:02 +0530 2 For Applicant : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 04/08/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.01/2025, application for exemption from filing typed copy of Annexure P/2. 2. On due consideration and for the reason mentioned in the application, same is allowed. The appellant is exempted from filing typed copy of Annexure P/2. 3. Also Heard on M.C.C., application for restoration of WPS No.3666/2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 27.06.2025 for want of prosecution. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that on 27.06.2025, counsel appearing for the applicant was engaged in another Court, thus, he could not appear when the case was taken up for hearing, therefore, the same was dismissed for want of prosecution. Hence, the said mistake was bonafide and the applicant wants to contest the case on merits, thus the instant MCC may be allowed. 5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, instant MCC is hereby allowed. 3 6. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to restore WPS No.3666/2019, (Jagdish Ram Sinha vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others) in its original number. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ravi Mandavi