APHC010530872014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25861/2014 Between: 1. SHAIK MEERA, W/O. MADINA,, OCC: COOLIE, R/O. PLOT NO. 95, 11-103/3, MADHURAVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CITY PLANNER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINAGADULA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA MOHAN PALANKI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- This Court, by order dated 04.09.2014, directed the respondents to follow due process of law in the event the petitioner is proposed to be evicted or dispossessed from the said property. It has been almost 11 years since the writ petition has been filed. It is submitted that the petitioner is still in possession of the property. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that on verification of the door number, no occupants were available at the said door number. 3. Be that as it may, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that in the event the occupants of Plot No.95, 11-103/3, situated in Survey No.27, Block-II at Madhuravada, Chinnagadula Mandal, Visakhapatnam are to be dispossessed or evicted, due process of law shall be followed by the respondent authorities. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 20.08.2025 SR