IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 781 OF 2001 Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the decree & Judgment in AS No.21 of 1998 on the file of Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kavali dated 12- 07-2001 confirming the judgment & decree in OS No.59 of 1990 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Kavali dated 4-10-1996 Between: Marthala Chennakesava Reddy, S/o. Chenna Reddy, Age; 74 years, R/e. Vengalarao Nagar, Kavali Town & Mandal, Nellore District. ...Appellant AND 1. Pavani Rukmangada Rao, S/o Lakshminarasimha Rao, Aged about 42 years. Book Binder, R/o. Janathpet, Kavali. 2. Marthala Ramamurthy Reddy, S/o. Chennakesavulu Reddy, Age 37 years. Business, R/o-Dodlavari Street, Kavali, Nellore District. ...Respondents Note: R-2 is dismissed for default vide C.O. dated 21/08/2009 Counsel for the Appellant: SRI P. SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M.RAVINDRANATH REDDY The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI _ (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO Vhousand and twenty five PRESENT JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHl QFf^nND APPEAI NO: 781/2001 Af HC010016452001 [3368] QMS ,:T i m I. I THE HONOURABLE SRI X Between; Marthala Chennakesava Reddy ...appellant AND ...RESPONDENT Pavani Rukmangadhara Rao Anr Counsel for the Appellant: 1.P SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1 .M S R SUBRAHMANYAM 2.M RAVINDRANATH REDDY Court made the following Judgment; Sri P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that notice died and till today, legal forward to The appearing through Video Conference the appellant returned as of the appellant did not come taken to representatives prosecute the Appeal. .^4 2 2. Learned counsel for respondent is in attendance, of the matter, this Second Appeal is dismissed In that view abated. No order as to costs. 3. as shall stand if any, pending Interlocutory applications cri/_ K TATA RAO deISW registrar SECTIC^OFFICER closed. //true copy// District, [with Kavali. SPSR Nellore SPSR Nellore To, principal District 1. The District, [with records if any] Civil Judge ISenior ior Division], Kavali S,i 2. The records if anyl 3. One CC to 4. One Pradesh at CG to Sri U VR Section Officer, 5. The Amaravati 6. Three CD Copies MV ram HIGH COURT DATED: 17/06/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.781 of 2001 ^ 2 3 SEP 2025 ^-SgseaicssS^ nr - DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS