Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20797 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.12.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Hardeep Singh ……...Petitioner Versus HPSEB …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be received, learned counsel representing the petitioner, while inviting attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWPOA No.1077 of 2019, titled as Nitin Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench this Court in Nitin Kumar (supra) and as such, petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of aforesaid
judgment in a time bound manner.
2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. Anil Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate, states that he is not averse to
2 aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and representation, if any, filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided expeditiously.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today in light of afore
judgment. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if he still remains aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. December 30, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil)
Judge