IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.953 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Mangal Singh …….Petitioner Versus Sh. Ashish Kohli & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate Generals _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 06.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 27.08.2025 passed by afore authority, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused the aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General. As per aforesaid documents, office order dated 28.03.2025 has been withdrawn by the respondent- Department vide order dated 27.08.2025 and direction has been issued to the Dy. Director of School Education Kangra at 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Dharamshala as well as Principal of the school concerned to comply with office order dated 5.10.2025 issued in compliance of judgment dated 11.07.2024 and office order dated 19.09.2025. 3. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner acknowledging the factum with regard to re-fixation of pay, but he states that financial benefits flowing from aforesaid compliance are yet to be released. 4. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from aforesaid compliance shall be released expeditiously. 5. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly same are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. However, respondents are directed to release all consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the compliance expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 07,2025 (shankar)