Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8011 MFA No. 6988 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6988 OF 2024 (MV-D) BETWEEN:
1.
ANWARA BEGUM D/O LATE GULAM YASIN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
2.
ASHRAF JAHANGIR, S/O LATE GULAM YASIN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
3.
SABNAM BGUM, D/O LATE GULAM YASIN, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT NO. 18/633, BANDE ROAD, KOGILU LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560064.
APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR T.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE MANAGER, HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.14, 1ST FLOOR, HM GENEVA HOUSE, NEXT TO FORITS HOSPITAL, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560052.
2.
M/S SAI SURYA CONCRETE, BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO.31, 2ND FLOOR, REVA COLLEGE ROAD, ITTIGE FACTORY,
Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8011 MFA No. 6988 of 2024
KOGILU LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560064.
3. SHANKARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.19, AK COLONY, DODDANEKKUNDI, BENGALURU - 560047.
4.
SRI. MANJUNATH, S/O NARAYAN SWAMY, AGED MAJOR, R/AT NO.19, AK COLONY, DODDANEKKUNDI, BENGALURU - 560047.
RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.01.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.
2876/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE MEMBER, MACT, XVIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU CITY (SCCH-4), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC,.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo which reads as follows:
“The undersigned counsel appearing for the appellants respectfully submits that, the appellants have filed an appeal in M.F.A.No.5321/2024 on the arising out of same
judgment passed by the Tribunal, which is pending for
consideration, despite the appellants preferred the above appeal by mistakenly, but not an intentional. Hence, this
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8011 MFA No. 6988 of 2024
Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the appellants to withdrawal the above appeal as not pressed and this Hon’ble Court may kindly be dismiss the above appeal as not pressed, in the ends of justice.”
2. In view of the aforementioned, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Pending interlocutory application do not survive for
consideration.
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
PNV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 281