[2025:RJ-JP:12252] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 138/2025 Narendra Singh S/o Shri Natthi Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mangleshpur Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Anil Kumar S/o Raju, R/o Nijamnagar Barodamev District Alwar (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Gajender Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/03/2025 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A (2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act being aggrieved of the order dated 08.01.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (Raj.) in Bail Application No. 05/2025 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.603/2024 registered at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r) & 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 117(2) of [2025:RJ-JP:12252] (2 of 4) [CRLAS-138/2025] BNS and Sections 3(1)(r) & 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to injured person has been opined as dangerous to life. It is submitted that according to the medical report, both grievous injuries have been found on non- vital part of the body. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Appellant is in custody since 04.01.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Further custody of the appellant would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for complainant vehemently opposes the prayer of bail made in this appeal. They submit that there is serious allegation against the appellant that he caused four injuries on the person of the injured out of which two injuries are opined as grievous in nature. 4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, so also considering the nature of injuries; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents as well as looking to the custody period, but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:12252] (3 of 4) [CRLAS-138/2025] 6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention Of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (Raj.) is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant- Narendra Singh S/o Shri Natthi Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No.603/2024 registered at Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar, shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-appellant shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in three months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the appellant, as directed above. In case the appellant fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:12252] (4 of 4) [CRLAS-138/2025] 10. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /105