Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3445 (CHH)

RAJENDRA PRASAD v. JHADWAIN BAI (DEAD)

REVP/9/2025 · 2025-01-27

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(Rev.Pet.No.9/2025) 2025:CGHC:4765 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 9 of 2025 Rajendra Prasad, S/o Ishlal Satnami, Aged about 51 years, R/o Village Udka, Nawagaon, Tehsil and District Mungeli (C.G.) (Defendant No. 1) (Appellant) ... Petitioner versus 1. Jhadwain Bai, W/d of Gambhir Das (now dead through LRs i.e. Non-applicant 2 to 5) 2. Chandrika Bai, D/o Late Gambhir Das, Aged about 66 years, W/o Ram Ratan, R/o Village Baiga Kapu, Tehsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) 3. Shanti Bai, D/o Late Gambhir Das, Aged about 64 years, W/o Neim Singh Satnami, R/o Village Khitakniha, Tehsil and District Mungeli (C.G.) 4. Heman Bai, D/o Late Gambhir Das, Aged about 62 years, W/o Kavilal Satnami, R/o Village Kapu (Temri), Tehsil and District Mungeli (C.G.) 5. Meena Bai, W/o Phooldas Satnami, Aged about 60 years, R/o Village Manpur (Bhaisa Muda), Tehsil & District Mungeli (C.G.) (Plaintiffs) 6. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Collector, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents (Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal) Order (In Chamber) (27/1/2025) 1. This review petition is filed barred by 1131 days for review / recall of judgment dated 20-12-2019 passed by this Court in S.A.No.474/2005 and it has been taken-up for consideration in Chamber in view of Rule 90(2) of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007 (for short, ‘the Rules of 2007’). SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2025.01.27 17:19:33 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.9/2025) 2. I have gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. After going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of judgment dated 20-12- 2019 passed by this Court in S.A.No.474/2005. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed on merits as also on the ground of limitation, in limine in terms of Rule 90(2) of the Rules of 2007 finding no sufficient cause for review of the judgment under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma