2025:JHHC:35246 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6645 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6645 of 2025 ---- 1. Md. Ayub @ Ayub, aged about 59 years, son of Late Kajim Miya 2. Khairun Khatoon @ Sairun Nisha, aged about 57 years, wife of Md. Ayub @ Ayub 3. Md. Arshad @ Md. Arshad Ali @ Arshad Ali, aged about 31 years, son of Md. Ayub @ Ayub All are resident of village – Kabed, PS – Keredari, PO – Pandu, District – Hazaribagh, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate :- Mr. Tanweer Abbas, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Mahua Palit, Advocate ---- 04/25.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No.85 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 290, 318, 108, 115, 117(2) and 74 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the informant was engaged in construction work of the house of petitioners and in discharging the said work he has fallen down and 2025:JHHC:35246 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6645 of 2025 has sustained certain injuries. He further submits that petitioner No.1 has taken the informant to the hospital and got him admitted and medical treatment was provided. He then submits that petitioner No.2 is the wife of petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.3 is the son of petitioner Nos.1 and 2. He next submits that after discharge from the hospital the informant has come to the house of the petitioners and demanded certain amount and due to that altercation took place and in this background the FIR has been lodged. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the informant has fallen while discharging the work at the construction site of the petitioners. 5. Considering that the petitioner No.1 is the owner of the house where the construction was going on and petitioner No.2 is the wife of petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.3 is son of petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and on fall by the informant the petitioner No.1 has taken him to hospital and provided him medical treatment and after discharge he has come to the place of petitioner and demanded certain amount and due to that altercation took place, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing 2025:JHHC:35246 --3-- A.B.A. No. 6645 of 2025 bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No.85 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 25.11.2025 Sangam/