1 2025:CGHC:32212 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3582 of 2025 Ramkaran Agrawal S/o Late Shri Kishan Lal Agrawal Aged About 79 Years R/o Vill- Bakimongra, Tah. Katghora, Dist- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Korba, Dist- Korba (C.G.) 2 - Dinesh Agrawal S/o Late Shri Govind Ram Agrawal Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill- Bakimongra, Tah. Katghora, Dist- Korba (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate For State/respondent No.1 : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 11/07/2025 Heard. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on the following relief(s) : VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.07.11 18:14:30 +0530 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the Courts below. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of CERTIORARI quashing the order dated 08.05.2025 passed by learned Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (C.G.) in Revenue Revision Case No. RN/10/R/B-121/140/2020 (Annexure P-1). 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem fit in the interest of justice.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner herein challenges the impugned order dated 08.05.2025 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (C.G.) in Revenue Revision Case No. RN/10/R/B-121/140/2020 as per Annexure P-1, whereby the Board of Revenue has allowed a Revision and reversed the order dated 04.11.2019 passed by the Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.), wherein the Commissioner has allowed the revision and set- aside the order dated 03.07.2018 passed by the learned Collector Korba in Revenue Appeal Case No. 04/B-121/2017-18, wherein the Collector has rejected the review application and affirmed his own order dated 08.05.2018, wherein he has ordered for fresh demarcation and quashed the earlier demarcation report dated 12.04.2016, without considering 3 the fact that in earlier demarcation report there is only dispute with respect to the land possessed by the respondent No. 02, where at the time of demarcation it was found that he has made encroachment over 361 square feet of the petitioner's land, but at the time of submission of demarcation report the Superintendent Land Record J.P. Singh has manipulated the report by overwriting over the area of encroached land by the respondent No. 02 and mentioned the land as "000", that after knowledge of the same the petitioner made complaint before the Collector Korba and the enquiry was made, wherein it was found that the overwriting has been done by the Superintendent Land Record J.P. Singh with respect to the encroachment made by the respondent No. 02, that the F.I.R. has also been registered against the J.P.Singh and the investigation is still pending, that as per demarcation report and subsequent enquiry report it is evident that the respondent No. 02 has made encroachment over the land of the petitioner, therefore the order of fresh demarcation of the entire khasra number is illegal, improper and contrary to the law. 3. Learned counsel for the respective respondents oppose the submission made by the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for the parties, since certain substantial 4 irregularities were pointed out in the demarcation report which was out of forgery, therefore, the Collector has directed for a fresh demarcation and if the fresh demarcation report is carried out no prejudice would be caused to the either of the parties. Therefore, there is no illegality in the order dated 08.05.2025 passed by the Board of Revenue, Bilaspur (C.G.). 6. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of any merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant