DILIP SINDHI SON OF SHRI AASHUDA MAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8317/2024 · 2025-01-16
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34446 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34446 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8317/2024 Dilip Sindhi Son of Shri Aashuda Mal, aged about 60 Years, Resident of 3B, New Colony, Gumanpura, Rojhala, New Green Mandi, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Prakash Veerwani Son of Shri Vishandas Veerwani, aged about 20 Years, Resident of 45B, Diya Complex, Bajrang Nagar, Borkhera, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh-PP Mr. Vishal Gurjar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 16/01/2025
1. The present misc. petition has been preferred for quashing of the FIR No. 472/2024 registered with Police Station, Gumanpura, Kota City for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC.
2. It is stated that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in the present matter.
3. This Court vide order dated 11.12.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise entered between them.
4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the parties appeared before the concerned Investigating Officer who
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8317/2024] has verified the factum of compromise entered between them and has submitted the verification report dated 01.01.2025, which indicates that the matter has been settled between the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688.
5. Counsel for the complainant has no objection if the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed.
6. In view of the aforesaid compromise, arrived at between the parties as well as the verification report dated 01.01.2025, furnished by the concerned Investigating Officer and in the light of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Apex the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 B.N.S.S.
7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition stands disposed of and impugned FIR No. 472/2024 registered with Police Station, Gumanpura, District Kota City stands quashed and set aside.
8. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/121