Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34445 (ALL)

SMT DEEPIKA PRAJAPATI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/690/2025 · 2025-04-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52909 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 690 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt Deepika Prajapati And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun at Orai to decide the Application / Suit No.895 of 2023 (Smt. Deepika Prajapati and another Vs. Deepak Prajapati) under Section 125 Cr.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Jalaun pending before it, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicant no.1 is the aggrieved wife and applicant no.2 is the minor daughter of opposite party no.2. She was ousted from her matrimonial house without any cogent reason and ground and she is suffering mentally and financially both. The case of maintenance u/s 125 Cr.P.C. was filed in 2023 before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Jalaun at Orai, which is still pending. It is further submitted that the applicant is a poor lady. She is not getting any maintenance. Hence, a prayer has been made to issue direction to the court concerned for expeditious disposal of the case. 4. These are the cases which require expeditious disposal because the sufferer is a lady almost in all the cases under section 125 Cr.P.C. The Court should be more sensitive in the cases where the aggrieved person is a wife and is fighting for her maintenance from her husband. 5. From the perusal of the order-sheet it reflects that the case is pending at the stage of evidence which is to be adduced by the applicant no.1 herself. 6. In the factual matrix of the case, the applicant no.1 is directed to adduce her evidence before the trial court within a period of two months from today and thereafter the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for the expeditious disposal of the aforesaid case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted in the matter by/to either of the parties. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad