Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34443 (RAJ)

FAHIM KHAN S/O LATE SHREE ISMILE KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15601/2024 · 2025-01-06

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:692] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15601/2024 1. Fahim Khan S/o Late Shree Ismile Khan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Labor Colony, Railway Stn. Ke Pass, Police Station Labor Colony, Firozabad, Distt. Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Tenant House No. 26, Shri Hanuman Bagichi Ke Pass, Kisan Colony, Sanganer, Police Station Malpuragate, Jaipur. 2. Shree Sharik Ansari S/o Shree Fahim Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Labor Colony, Railway Stn. Ke Pass, Police Station Labor Colony, Firozabad, Distt. Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Tenant House No. 26, Shri Hanuman Bagichi Ke Pass, Kisan Colony, Sanganer, Police Station Malpuragate, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/01/2025 The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 610/2024 registered at Police Station Malpuragate, District Jaipur City East for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 324(4), 132, 121(1), 125 and 352 of BNS and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage To Public Property Act. [2025:RJ-JP:692] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15601/2024] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 29.11.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of bail application. Heard and perused the material available on record. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the case of the petitioners is triable by Magistrate, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Fahim Khan S/o Late Shree Ismile Khan, 2. Shree Sharik Ansari S/o Shree Fahim Khan, in connection with FIR No. 610/2024 registered at Police Station Malpuragate, District Jaipur City East shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /377