ANJALI ARORA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/695/2025 · 2025-04-27
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:65384 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 695 of 2025 Applicant :- Anjali Arora And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Abbas Shaukat Abidi,Syed Ahmed Faizan,Syed Ali Shaukat (Abidi) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 400 of 2023 under Section 125 CrPC, Police Sttaion- Indirapuram, District- Ghaziabad pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghaziabad expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid case was filed on 25.4.2023 and an application regarding the interim maintenance was moved by the applicant on 3.1.2024 despite appearance of the opposite party no.2 the case has not proceeded any further and is still pending before the Court concerned. It is also submitted that an affidavit in compliance of the direction given by the Hon'ble Apex Court passed in Rajnesh Vs. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324 has already been submitted. It is also submitted that no interim maintenance has been granted by the Court concerned in favour of the applicant and the opposite party no.2 is applying delaying tactics in disposal of the said case and only dates are being fixed in the matter. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the application for interim maintenance in accordance with law preferably within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, and thereafter all endeavours shall be made by it for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 6. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc.
are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 7. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad