lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA' TUESDAY, THE TWENTYFIRST DAYOFJANUARY, fj TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.- 8607 OF 2024 Betwee n.- shaik Anas, S/o AIIabakshu, age 31. R/o 19-37-63, Mozid Sreet, Kankara Gunta, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. AND ... PetI-tI-Oner/Accused The State OfAndhra Pradesh, Rep by its publI'C Prosecutor High Court ofA P Amaravathi. ...Respondent/complainant petition under section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated jn the grounds filed I-n Support Of the Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the release of the petitioner/accused on baIJl in the event of his Arrest in connectI-On With Crime No 802 of 2024 dated o1-ll-2024 on the file of NaIIapadu Police Station, Guntur, Guntur District. lANO: 1 OF2024 petition under sectI'On 528 of BNSS prayl'ng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hish Court may be pleased to direct the release of the petl'tl-oner/accused on ba" I'n the event of his Arrest in connectI-On Wl'th Crime No 802 of 2024 dated o1-ll-2024 on the file of NaIIapadu police statl|on,Guntur, Guntur District, pendI'ng disposal of CRLP 8607 of 2024, on the file of the High Court. The petI-tjOn` coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petI-lion and the grounds filed in supp%ttihereof and upon hearing the arguments of Ms PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate for the petitI-Oner and of Public Prosecutor for Respondent, the court made the following. ORDER: APHCO10531122024 lN THE HIGH COURTOF ANDHRA E PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (special orig-lnal Jurisd-lction) [3327] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY '~' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY PETITION NO.8607 OF 2024 CRIMINAL Between : Shaik Anas ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Pradesh counsel for the pet-ItiOner/accused: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant'. 1. PUBLIC PROSE,CUTOR The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagar'lk Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/Accused, Seeking ant'lC'lPatOry ba'll, in COnneCtiOn With crime No.802 of 2024 of Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur district. G,Z= €rfe ed 7 L' E= 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner herein and others for the offences punishable under sections 109(1), /. 329(4),74, 324(6) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled castes and the scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 3. Caseoftheprosecution, in brief, is that, on 31.10.2024, at about 09.30 PM, while the de facfo complainant and her younger son and her sister's son were celebrating Deepavali festival by firing crackers, six members came in a Car and motor cycle and beat her chI'Idren indiscriminately. They also pulled them inside -+ ?fy the house and beat them with rods and tried to kill them. One -`\ > David caught hold her neck and beat her and they all abused her in filthy language by touching her caste name. Later, when they are going to their flat, about 15 to 20 members trespassed into her house with deadly weapons and pushed her by touching her breast and damaged her house. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. A perusal of the material on record goes to show that all the accusations are attributed against other accused. The only accusation attributed against the petitioner herein is that he was asked to drive the car and he carried out the job in taking the E= i= -I accused to the house of the de facfo complainant. A quarrel ensued between the accused and the de facfo complainant on the ground that some of the crackers were directed to the house of the accused. ln connection with that, on the date of alleged incident, all the accused went in a Car to the house of the de facto complainant and beat her. No specific act has been attributed against the petitioner here'ln, except stating that he drove the car along with other accused. 6. ln view of the aforesaid facts and Circumstances Of the case, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein/Accused on the following conditions. i) ln the event of arrest of the petitioner herein/Accused in the aforesaid crime, he shall be enlarged on bail On his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two Sureties Of the like sum each to the I I,tD. satisfaction of the concerned Arresting Officer. ii) petitioner shall make h-ImSelf available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required, and he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat Or Promise tO \`3, any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to I- 4 dlssuade A,m from a,sc'osfng such facts to the court or to any POIice officer. Ill) Petlt,oner sha" appear before the statlon House offICer concerned once ln a week I e , on every sunday between 10 00 AM and o1 00 PM tl'' fllI'ng of charge sheet. 7. Accordl'ng'y, the cn'mlnal petltl'on Its a"owed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petltlons, If any, pend,'ng ,n thIS Crl'ml'nal pet,-I,Ion sha" stand closed. ) \f _-,``vi``_,q',^` _,---*~ .` - ( i,,_-`.L.=L==--_ Ass/s TAF#¥; J==SL5!_ DE\iI EP I 5iEinA yre\ To, 1. 2. 3. 4. llTRUE COPY}+ __ -~ __ §_~E€Qf;_ --I _ .-__--_ TDhnee ScHcOt:NMa/I:app:dLuLI=:lIAC\e^IS==::\n ,. Guntur. Guntur DIStrICt one cc to M/s pJLL'X LAW FIRM Advocate [opucJ Two cos to publfc prosecutor, H,gh court ofAndhra pradesh [ouTJ One spare copy RT= i- F- `--------l~```^.-----_-_ HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED:21/01/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.8607 of 2024 ALLOWED EBEEEEE frf`, frof-argiv chrf,/` ~, /